J Neurosurg 145:92–102, 2026
In patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for a symptomatic Rathke’s cleft cyst, does cyst-wall resection reduce recurrence sufficiently to justify its potentially greater endocrine morbidity, or is simple fenestration the preferable strategy?
Objective
To compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of cyst-wall resection and fenestration in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for Rathke’s cleft cysts.
Methods
This retrospective, single-center study included 278 patients treated between 2000 and 2023:
- 122 underwent cyst-wall resection.
- 156 underwent fenestration and drainage.
- Mean follow-up was 68 months.
- A propensity-matched cohort of 242 patients was used for the principal comparison.
The authors analyzed headache, visual and endocrine outcomes, postoperative complications and cyst recurrence.
Main results
Fenestration and resection achieved similar improvement in visual and endocrine symptoms. However, headache resolution was significantly better after fenestration:
- Gross-total resection: 43%
- Subtotal resection: 34%
- Fenestration: 59%
New growth-hormone deficiency was less frequent after fenestration:
- Gross-total resection: 10%
- Subtotal resection: 16%
- Fenestration: 3.2%
The overall recurrence rate was 24%:
- Gross-total resection: 18%
- Subtotal resection: 39%
- Fenestration: 25%
Recurrence-free survival was comparable between fenestration and gross-total resection. Subtotal resection showed the least favorable results.
A residual cyst on postoperative MRI was the strongest independent predictor of recurrence (HR 4.01; 95% CI 2.41–6.65).
Interpretation
The findings question the need for routine aggressive cyst-wall removal. Fenestration provided equivalent visual and endocrine improvement, better headache relief and fewer new hormonal deficits without increasing recurrence compared with gross-total resection.
Attempting cyst-wall resection without achieving complete removal may offer little benefit: subtotal resection combines greater pituitary manipulation with a relatively high recurrence rate.
Limitations
The study was retrospective and conducted at a single institution. Treatment selection was not randomized, surgical practice evolved during the 23-year study period, and follow-up was longer in the fenestration group.
Clinical takeaway
Wide fenestration appears to offer the best balance between decompression, symptom relief, endocrine preservation and recurrence control. Aggressive cyst-wall removal should not be pursued when the wall is firmly adherent to the pituitary gland or stalk.



















You must be logged in to post a comment.